<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Critical Voices</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.eriontheinterweb.com/2009/07/critical-voices/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.eriontheinterweb.com/2009/07/critical-voices/</link>
	<description>About exploring and designing for the web.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Jul 2010 01:17:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marie-Laure</title>
		<link>http://www.eriontheinterweb.com/2009/07/critical-voices/#comment-52</link>
		<dc:creator>Marie-Laure</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 05:45:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eriontheinterweb.com/?p=93#comment-52</guid>
		<description>Interesting post Eri!
Think you&#039;re partly right about behaviour changing as a result of being behind a machine - but I think it&#039;s also an element of being &#039;once removed&#039; from the person. It&#039;s like people who talk about about you behind your back, but would never have the front to do it to your face. I expect some humans will always behave like this, and maybe more so as it is easier to hide behind a machine. Conversing via the internet is interesting as it is a written medium, yet we&#039;re treating social media tools as if they are oral media. Maybe we&#039;re still just newbies and learning how to behave in our new environment!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting post Eri!<br />
Think you&#8217;re partly right about behaviour changing as a result of being behind a machine &#8211; but I think it&#8217;s also an element of being &#8216;once removed&#8217; from the person. It&#8217;s like people who talk about about you behind your back, but would never have the front to do it to your face. I expect some humans will always behave like this, and maybe more so as it is easier to hide behind a machine. Conversing via the internet is interesting as it is a written medium, yet we&#8217;re treating social media tools as if they are oral media. Maybe we&#8217;re still just newbies and learning how to behave in our new environment!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kristin rohan</title>
		<link>http://www.eriontheinterweb.com/2009/07/critical-voices/#comment-26</link>
		<dc:creator>kristin rohan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 03:49:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eriontheinterweb.com/?p=93#comment-26</guid>
		<description>hey eri - great post as usual! 

if people don&#039;t want to deal with snarky people, best to make sure they are not being snarky to start (i&#039;m talking about myself firstly). if we fail to make a big deal about the negative whingers, it will give them less fuel for next time.

not to say all aspects of arguments shouldn&#039;t be presented and considered - i get some gold nuggets of insight from criticism - but i need to remember not to look at it as criticism - but as someone&#039;s else&#039;s opinion. sometimes it&#039;s hard.

it&#039;s because we (i) get emotional - humans are passionate creatures - but letting emotions and negativity get the best of us, that&#039;s when issues are not resolved or improved.

i try to treat people like i like to be treated - and then monitor how much negative/snarky stuff i participate in and read. i can usually find the same info somewhere else w/out the patronizing and meanness.

it&#039;s easy to dwell on the negative and stingy people - but there are so many positive &amp; collaborative people out there - especially in Sydney. that&#039;s why i love it here.

cheers to you, for tackling a sticky subject - but presenting it objectively and professionally.

best,
kristin rohan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hey eri &#8211; great post as usual! </p>
<p>if people don&#8217;t want to deal with snarky people, best to make sure they are not being snarky to start (i&#8217;m talking about myself firstly). if we fail to make a big deal about the negative whingers, it will give them less fuel for next time.</p>
<p>not to say all aspects of arguments shouldn&#8217;t be presented and considered &#8211; i get some gold nuggets of insight from criticism &#8211; but i need to remember not to look at it as criticism &#8211; but as someone&#8217;s else&#8217;s opinion. sometimes it&#8217;s hard.</p>
<p>it&#8217;s because we (i) get emotional &#8211; humans are passionate creatures &#8211; but letting emotions and negativity get the best of us, that&#8217;s when issues are not resolved or improved.</p>
<p>i try to treat people like i like to be treated &#8211; and then monitor how much negative/snarky stuff i participate in and read. i can usually find the same info somewhere else w/out the patronizing and meanness.</p>
<p>it&#8217;s easy to dwell on the negative and stingy people &#8211; but there are so many positive &amp; collaborative people out there &#8211; especially in Sydney. that&#8217;s why i love it here.</p>
<p>cheers to you, for tackling a sticky subject &#8211; but presenting it objectively and professionally.</p>
<p>best,<br />
kristin rohan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laurel Papworth</title>
		<link>http://www.eriontheinterweb.com/2009/07/critical-voices/#comment-25</link>
		<dc:creator>Laurel Papworth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 12:41:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eriontheinterweb.com/?p=93#comment-25</guid>
		<description>gosh that&#039;s old - I&#039;d forgotten about it :) 

yes, I wasn&#039;t really debating ratings systems - more talking about how &quot;report cards&quot; reinforce positive behaviour. 
Incidentally, I don&#039;t believe people behave worse online - and BazaarVoice found that 4/5 of reviews are positive for example. But I do think we mix with more people outside of our own value system ( our friends/colleagues share our values normally) so we are exposed to more passionate discussions than we usually are comfortable with.

It&#039;s all good - we were becoming too stodgy and politically correct. Whoever said a good stoush wasn&#039;t good for our evolution anyway ;)

Eri, you might like the reputation diagram at http://laurelpapworth.com/ripple-social-network-influencers/ 
Cheers 
Laurel @SilkCharm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>gosh that&#8217;s old &#8211; I&#8217;d forgotten about it :) </p>
<p>yes, I wasn&#8217;t really debating ratings systems &#8211; more talking about how &#8220;report cards&#8221; reinforce positive behaviour.<br />
Incidentally, I don&#8217;t believe people behave worse online &#8211; and BazaarVoice found that 4/5 of reviews are positive for example. But I do think we mix with more people outside of our own value system ( our friends/colleagues share our values normally) so we are exposed to more passionate discussions than we usually are comfortable with.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s all good &#8211; we were becoming too stodgy and politically correct. Whoever said a good stoush wasn&#8217;t good for our evolution anyway ;)</p>
<p>Eri, you might like the reputation diagram at <a href="http://laurelpapworth.com/ripple-social-network-influencers/" rel="nofollow">http://laurelpapworth.com/ripple-social-network-influencers/</a><br />
Cheers<br />
Laurel @SilkCharm</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
